The love of money is primarily the
love of the means to accumulate. I own 3 guitars and 2 amps, and could easily
justify additions and would be sorely tempted to purchase accordingly, if funds allowed. My
thirst for things is not easily quenched.
However, I don’t like indebtedness in my accounts and disrespect my
government for its unwillingness to
balance theirs.
Whatever resolve we might have
to fight off the love of what money will accumulate, we are overwhelmed by sales
pitches recommending yet another purchase to meet an ever-expanding set of felt
needs -- within a system that depends on unnecessary purchasing to keep so many
of us employed.
Yet when machines and robots do
most of the work, even fight our wars, by what cheap thrills will the rulers
distract us? How long before the NFL is
on every night of the week, before no medications are illegal, and a casino is
within walking distance of all? Oh, what
Huxley could see with a 1932 lens!
I pine for the days before free-agency
in baseball, for the decades when corporations considered taxation a part of community obligations,
when blue-collar workers could count on a union to help secure a living wage –
and yes, when America produced nearly half the world’s goods. ;-)
Though I’m a selfish person --
who nonetheless admires the communalist --
“from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs”
sounds like the kingdom of God to me.
Marana tha.
What opportunity the Church will
have to preach contentment -- in plenty or want.